Justice R M Lodha and Justice Anil R.
Dave issued notice to Bihar Govt. and Union of India within 6 weeks. Item
no.12, court no.6, dated 7/1/2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. ___178_______OF
2012
[PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH ARTICLES 21, 19, 14, 21A, 256, 257 and 356 OF
THE CONSTITUTION IN PUBLIC INTEREST FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS]
IN THE MATTER OF:
1.
Abhishek
Ranjan Kumar
With Aaditya Kumar,
Rahul Maurya, Nikhil Kumar.
Petitioners
Versus
1. Union of India,
2. Hon’ble Union Home
Minister of India represented
3. Chief Secretary, Government of
Bihar
4. Shri
Abhayanand, IPS
Director General of Police, Bihar
Police Headquarters, Old Secretariat,
Patna, Bihar-800015.
5. Station
House Officer
Town
Police station, Muzaffarpur,
Bihar.
6. Sh.
Amit Kumar Sub Inspector
and investigating Officer,
Town
Police station, Muzaffarpur,
Bihar.
7. Resident
Commissioner of Bihar
Stationed in Delhi, Kautilya Marg
Chanakaya Puri, New Delhi-110001.
Respondents.
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH ARTICLES 21, 19, 14, 21A, 256, 257 and 356 OF
THE CONSTITUTION IN PUBLIC INTEREST FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR THE SAFE
RETURN OF NAVARUNA A MINOR AGED 11YEARS, STUDENT OF 7TH CLASS ST. XAVIERS
SCHOOL, MUZAFFARPUR.
SYNOPSIS
The present writ petition places
before this Hon’ble Court the kidnapping
of Navaruna aged 11 years and a student of 7th Class studying St. Xaviers
School Muzaffarpur in Bihar in intervening night of 18th and 19th 2012 from her bedroom. This
family being a Bengali Speaking people are a linguistic minority in the State
of Bihar. The S.H.O. Town police Station registered the case U/ss 364 and 366
IPC, but till now i.e. for over two months the child has not been recovered. The Investigation Officer came to Delhi and
threatened the petitioners and the student community to stop their legitimate
demonstrations or all will be arrested. The petitioners have recorded these
threats and transcript forming part of the annexures alongwith a C.D. The petition is also supported by the
official records of National Crime Reports Bureau (See Bihar police website)
which puts kidnappings in Bihar for the years 2010 and 2011 above 4000 each
year. The website of the Bihar Police has also put the figures of
kidnappings in the State till August this year more than 3000 among which there
are some, ransom demands, All these are official records. In addition the
national and international print and electronic media has been reporting
statements by some well known public men demanding the Chief Minister of the
State of Bihar as to why his government is not able to recover the childand of
the existing crime atmosphere in the State to which neither he nor any minister
of his cabinet had spoken to the public whose confidence in governance of State
is dwindling which is touted as Susashan i.e. good governance.
The situation represents total failure of
law and order which is the primary duty of the State of Bihar and the Union
Government is duty bound to take necessary measures under the constitution and
restore public order.
The police allege that it is a case of elopement and also
may be case of property dispute without producing on iota of evidence. The petition is filed purely in
public interest without any private, personal interest or gain solely to save
the child Navaruna and restore people’s faith in Rule of law.
PRAYER
In view of
the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this
Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
(a) issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the
respondents No. 3,4 and 5 to produce the minor child Navaruna before this
Hon’ble Court;
(b) issue direction to the Respondents No.1 and
2 to take the governance of the State of Bihar to curt crimes and restore law
and order in the State protecting the life and liberty of Navaruna and also of
the general public in that state;
(c) direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to hand
over the investigation of the present case to CBI or any other organization;
(d) grant any other relief which the Hon’ble
Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case;
AND FOR THIS
ACT OF KINDNESS THE PETITIONER AS IS DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY.
Hi to every single one, it's really a good for me to visit this web site, it includes useful Information.
ReplyDeleteMy web page :: cash advance no credit
There's definately a lot to know about this topic. I love all the points you've made.
ReplyDeleteTake a look at my homepage; before and after breast augmentation